Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Moh Dentistry Uae Sample Question Paper

1:12 - initiative of the Young Socialist: Stalinists play "Democracy"

currently collects the Young Socialists (a radical left-wing splinter group of the SP) signatures for a Swiss people's initiative, with which the free market economy is to be questioned. The goal of the initiators is general proportionate rules on the wage levels set by law. Specifically, should therefore no one can earn a 12-fold of what deserves the lowest remunerated employees. Of course, this project not presented as a general Wirtschaftsbevormundung, but as an act of social justice.

That such a political foray in the end not ameliorate welfare in favor of the poor effect should rather be clear to everyone who looks through the expropriation plans. How many private companies could survive such a policy?

An essential part of the Swiss economy consists of private companies. This does not usually have the publicly-supported economic entities are financed her own in nature and are dependent on income. An ongoing struggle against the authorities, major investments in the development and security, social issues, bridging economic crises, etc. cost the employer a lot of money. Money, which ultimately will be invested by the employers or the managers of the company must must also be taken somewhere. The general criminalization of all earners testifies Unserieusität therefore, lack of objectivity and lack of understanding of managerial activities. Imagine what the following example: A young person

ventures with limited assets the bold step in economic independence. In a state that is characterized by censorship, restriction of expression and academic freedoms (such as Switzerland, Germany), one has to the type of company is not always the best conditions. An expensive and arduous war against the authorities (for example, arbitrary denial of necessary permits, licensing) is only the beginning of the whole. After recording more expensive loans to wear a certain risk before one can usually start with the actual business. Later in day-one is exposed to strong competition and must meet ever-new demands for the customers. Thus, job creation and rising living standards in the region. Under these circumstances, an employer needs a sufficiently high income. He needs to take to get the long-term economic survival of a once may collect a tidy sum, without that he can pay his employee any wage. This entrepreneurial freedom is crucial for the private sector and everyone could even get into a situation in which he is glad to be a relevant non-paternalism. A guardianship of the private companies that is not supported with government funds would, therefore, an expropriation.

Another issue is the state-owned enterprises. Whether officials or companies with a monopoly, does not really matter. What must be financed by the public sector-ie, the managers take their own risk and no money to invest and the guidelines under public law. It can not be that high government officials to enrich themselves and heads of public service companies in taxes and other low-wage workers can do the dirty work. The basis that every person has equal value, should be sufficient to know that all people working in the public service are calculated compensation equal to physical work and time should not matter whether Federal or a laborer. Therefore, it would be incomprehensible if the salaries of senior officials on the 12-fold, respectively so arrogant leaves, as they are.

demand rights politicians from different parties have long been a reduction of the high officials such as the salaries of cabinet ministers, government councils and national councils, but who fought most vigorously against it? - Those who appears 12 times the salary of any person conducting demand while at the same time promote the expropriation of private enterprises. A private entrepreneur free state with a fixed hierarchy, in what makes wealthy executives earn 12 times more than their subjects ... Seems much more in a diseased brain of a left does not proceed.

Password: No!

not sign a signature form, not even with a false name and address, as they are often controlled by the Federal Chancellery only sampled!

0 comments:

Post a Comment