Thursday, March 18, 2010

The Ups Man Brazilian Wax

... and again the next ban: After follow Killer Paintball Games

The absurd Gesetzesvorstösse flood at the time the Swiss political landscape: first, the prohibition of paintball and now claims to be "killer games" targeted. How great to support such concerns when voters will ultimately depend on the demographic situation safely. By increasing people aging were left politician by bringing in the last decade some concerns:
example, was banned in the city of Zurich, the Zurich tradition of the school Silvesters of noise reasons in the public space and potentially dangerous items such as fireworks or chemicals are requirements by "security" Made virtually inaccessible to minors. It is undisputed that these security terrorist is an educational disaster, but left-wing politicians have no end in sight to their Verbotswut.


The rewarded with taxpayers' money annually Fr.100 000 .-- SP-National Evi Councillor Allen had nothing better to do than file a motion, computer games that you are not fit to prohibit general . In a true dictatorship have a government with the task of educating the people and disempowering. The ordinary citizens should therefore be taken off the task to decide what he wants to consume. Just as with last year's Ban request of the paintballs in this case was returned to the argument that one can achieve anything with such bans for violence prevention. All Swiss would finally have an IQ of an SP-selector: Sufficient low that it is through a violent game. For a characterization of the Left, one could hardly take a better example.


prohibitions, that the citizen is deprived of its own choice, serve to maintain existing repressive measures against political opponents upright. The more a nation decides to moral policing laws and regulations, the easier it will have a government opositionelle literature to prohibit by law. are

In a pseudo-democracy parties brought into disrepute, symbols and deviant ideas prohibitions. to maintain order such bans, it basically as good as is everything that promoted by the government as morally reprehensible, be allowed, since personal responsibility encourages freedom of thought, what the self-styled "democratic" regime would probably be a bit too democratic.

0 comments:

Post a Comment