principle that money from the air back into the aviation
On 29 November 2009 agrees Swiss voters on the creation of a special finance air traffic. By amending the Federal Constitution do the government and parliament to create the condition that the portion of the proceeds from the fuel tax, which is today the traffic benefit, can in future be used for aviation.
The polluter pays principle, an economically unjustifiable model, the aim of this initiative. Basically, it is not the big change economy if the money that is spent anyway, right from the aviation income is, or whether it is feeding through other taxes.
argue proponents of the initiative with the necessary investments for the benefit of security against terrorist attacks and accidents. That such ridiculous arguments being misused once again to further develop this obsession with security, ultimately resulting in a price increase and again the air is, should each be aware of. Some security measures have recently been so exaggerated that they almost can not be taken seriously and become ineffective soon. Therefore would be more money flows in this direction, a bad investment, money that could be used for purposes sinnvollrer.
the other hand, one must see that this development will be drawn either way. "Security measures", which in the end but only aim at developing the Ueberwachungsstaates be expanded whether with or without the adoption of this initiative, but in the end pays the public, either through fuel surcharges or fare via the direct federal taxes.
is basically a state and its cash flows for the average citizen to control clearer and better if funds come directly as possible from where they will be reinstated. The less "detour" that makes money, the better the cash flow can be observed and the government may be less well suppressed. Fuel prices are not affected by this initiative, only the fact that these revenues will in the air . Revert
Although the adoption of the initiative hopes for an early abolition of the fuel tax is buried is definitely the initiative not so reprehensible. By a possible rejection of the initiative, the fuel tax would not be reduced, however, had the Swiss transport minister Lord too many arguments.
Conclusion:
remains with the adoption of the initiative about the money where it comes from and if you could then reduce the expense of air travel mode, we would also soon be a reduction in fuel prices. The aviation industry would therefore by this constitutional amendment a means in hand to effect a price cut, what kind of YES Initiative talks.
0 comments:
Post a Comment